标题: 《被缚的普罗米修斯》不是埃斯库罗斯的作品？ [打印本页] 作者: Hermes 时间: 2009-7-29 20:51 标题: 《被缚的普罗米修斯》不是埃斯库罗斯的作品？ 今天看《埃斯库罗斯的神义论》中M.L.West的文章，开篇第一句就是：“目前，有占压倒性优势的证据，否认《普罗米修斯》的作者是埃斯库罗斯……” 作者认为该剧的作者借鉴过埃斯库罗斯，但成书年代应稍晚于索福克勒斯的《安提戈涅》。作者: Hermes 时间: 2009-7-29 21:01
The Authenticity of Prometheus Bound (Cambridge Classical Studies) (Paperback)
by Mark Griffith
Prometheus Bound was accepted without question in antiquity as the work of Aeschylus, and most modern authorities endorse this ascription. But since the nineteenth century several leading scholars have come to doubt Aeschylean authorship. Dr Griffith here provides a thorough and wide-ranging study of this problem, and concludes: 'Had Prometheus Bound been newly dug up from the sands of Oxyrhynchus... few scholars would regard it as the work of Aeschylus.' After a preliminary assessment of the external evidence, Dr Griffith examines minutely the idiosyncrasies of metre, dramatic technique, vocabulary, syntax and expression to be found in the play, applying the same tests to other plays of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides in order to provide a control for his methods. In his final chapter he discusses how the conditions surrounding the ancient transmission and cataloguing of texts may have led to the ascription to Aeschylus.
